trueguy
03-14 04:56 PM
There are total 27 EB3-I approvals on since Oct'2008. In 6 months, only 27 approvals is not a good number.
Does anybody know why USCIS is not touching EB3-I aggressively and are we close to using all EB3-I for this year already?
Thanks.
Does anybody know why USCIS is not touching EB3-I aggressively and are we close to using all EB3-I for this year already?
Thanks.
wallpaper very funny pictures of abies.
vandanaverdia
09-12 01:56 PM
Don't wait.
The time will
never be
just right
Napoleon Hill
The time is NOW!!!
It's NOW or NEVER!!!
Come to DC & let's be heard!!!
GO IV!!!
The time will
never be
just right
Napoleon Hill
The time is NOW!!!
It's NOW or NEVER!!!
Come to DC & let's be heard!!!
GO IV!!!
logiclife
06-30 12:34 PM
Merged the other thread of HR 5744 by GOD_BLESS_YOU into this thread to avoid duplicate threads on same topic.
2011 Funny Baby Pictures Graphics
eastindia
05-18 12:37 PM
It was Easy.
Done again today.
I will send one everyday to both Congress people and Reporters
Done again today.
I will send one everyday to both Congress people and Reporters
more...
amitjoey
05-23 09:52 AM
The total pledged is $4550. The actual total is probably little more than that, Because some people have donated but have not written on this thread.
needhelp!
06-24 10:29 AM
\ \/
more...
gk_2000
03-28 09:01 PM
Let us disagree on this, whats that supposed to be a back-handed negative comment?
not so complex.. I was referring to this dot concept. Never heard of that anywhere LOL
not so complex.. I was referring to this dot concept. Never heard of that anywhere LOL
2010 Some very freaky (and funny)
EBX-Man
03-28 07:38 PM
Kya bada bada baatenin karte miyan. Hallo Hallo baatenin nahi karne ka kya?
idhar saare bhoota jainse batan karte. Questioona pooche do katne kou dodhate mian.
Spillower ke time kiaku milna phirhic mian. Thabichichi sab loga yaha kaatani ko dowdthe mian yahan per
Applogo ka advocacy apko mubarak mian
Applogo ka donation apko mubarak mian
Applogo ka gc apko mubarak mian
Apun jaisa logo ko yahn per koi ijjat nahi mian
Main jaatu yahan se mian.
Main Jatu ....
:(:(:(
idhar saare bhoota jainse batan karte. Questioona pooche do katne kou dodhate mian.
Spillower ke time kiaku milna phirhic mian. Thabichichi sab loga yaha kaatani ko dowdthe mian yahan per
Applogo ka advocacy apko mubarak mian
Applogo ka donation apko mubarak mian
Applogo ka gc apko mubarak mian
Apun jaisa logo ko yahn per koi ijjat nahi mian
Main jaatu yahan se mian.
Main Jatu ....
:(:(:(
more...
storm
07-09 12:56 PM
Updates:
I got an email from my law firm, that my packet was refused to be accepted by USCIS.
I received the email from my law firm (Monday night - July 2) that:
Please note however your case was sent to Nebraska last night and did arrive - we tried!
Which means mine was sent or reached NSC sunday night or must have been hand delievered early Mon morning. Don't know exactly what happened. I just trust them!!!!
I didn't bother to ask my law firm further details. I will ping them first thing monday morning and try to give any update I get. I hope they have some proof of the refusal!!!!!!!............
If it was sent Fedex, DHL or UPS, ask for the tracking number. You'll be able to trace if it was really sent to USCIS or not.
I got an email from my law firm, that my packet was refused to be accepted by USCIS.
I received the email from my law firm (Monday night - July 2) that:
Please note however your case was sent to Nebraska last night and did arrive - we tried!
Which means mine was sent or reached NSC sunday night or must have been hand delievered early Mon morning. Don't know exactly what happened. I just trust them!!!!
I didn't bother to ask my law firm further details. I will ping them first thing monday morning and try to give any update I get. I hope they have some proof of the refusal!!!!!!!............
If it was sent Fedex, DHL or UPS, ask for the tracking number. You'll be able to trace if it was really sent to USCIS or not.
hair very funny pictures of abies.
va_labor2002
12-01 03:43 PM
Congress is enacting law. White House is just approving the bill into law. Any way White House is positive in our issue. What we need today is to have attention of congress. Member of Congress are scared with citizens and media. We need at Capitol, if we have to.
I believe, this will create big impact on media and members of congress.
Can we organize a hunger strike in front of CAPITOL HILL ,just for one day ?
IV can co-ordinate the event. It will give BIG media attention in DC. It will open the eyes of American people !
I believe, this will create big impact on media and members of congress.
Can we organize a hunger strike in front of CAPITOL HILL ,just for one day ?
IV can co-ordinate the event. It will give BIG media attention in DC. It will open the eyes of American people !
more...
immiusa
05-25 01:44 PM
Transaction ID: 9NF02208A1037882U
hot really funny and cute aby
clumsybird
08-05 09:31 PM
Hi guys, I really need your advice on this :
1)Working for a large financial consulting firm A now, in-house lawyers dealt with the H-1B, renewing it now for Oct this year (sent in May, haven't heard back).
2)Want to join a 7-people Start Up company B as a financial analyst, which does not want to hire me as an "employee" but only as a "consultant" (i guess understandable for tax/risk reasons as the president of the firm is also hired as a consultant so ...).
3)How can I keep my H-1B with me? Can company B sponsor me as a consultant? or I need to have a third party consulting firm as a bridge? If so, any good agent or lawyers I can talk to?
Any advice highly appreciated.
Best,
CB
1)Working for a large financial consulting firm A now, in-house lawyers dealt with the H-1B, renewing it now for Oct this year (sent in May, haven't heard back).
2)Want to join a 7-people Start Up company B as a financial analyst, which does not want to hire me as an "employee" but only as a "consultant" (i guess understandable for tax/risk reasons as the president of the firm is also hired as a consultant so ...).
3)How can I keep my H-1B with me? Can company B sponsor me as a consultant? or I need to have a third party consulting firm as a bridge? If so, any good agent or lawyers I can talk to?
Any advice highly appreciated.
Best,
CB
more...
house really funny magic of
TheOmbudsman
11-08 02:18 PM
Hi Vina92,
Thanks for asking.
I am happy that we see a change. The Iraq war is not going well. I do not believe that Democrats are necessarily more qualified and honest than Republicans, but the balance of power is welcome.
Regarding to immigration, my point is that I am certainly happy that we may see things moving - not because they will move directly suited to our category - but we may take a ride with the amnesty CIR bill. That is indirectly positive to us and that may turn out to be good thing indeed.
Since the Democrat led bill is primary designed to satisfy employers looking for low income labor and supply democrats with potential voters in the future, my concern is that many of us may get into trouble ahead, when millions of illegal aliens get their cases in the USCIS queue. In addition, I have to observe that I have a long-term vision:I believe that an amnesty of this magnitute will bring the US to its knees in the mid-term. That is more a long-term vision, but that's what I think and if that is correct, that is certainly troublesome because that would make all my efforts to get a GC unviable at that point. I would not worry about that now. We need to finish our GC business and get out of this as soon as possible.
Some members of this forum continue to distort facts. Nothing has changed for me. I captured all the information I had available back then and discussed with you all. In the last two months violence in Iraq has escalated to unacceptable levels and that has changed the outcome of the elections, apparently to our short-term advantage. It is time for a change for sure. Let's welcome the change.
Again, I am planning to discuss our issues and constantly and deliver fresh daily comments to you all on daily basis. Let's hope that we will have more positive news coming.
Regards,
The Ombudsman
"Your dose of daily reality"
I do not understand what Ombudsman is trying to imply. Are you happy or unhappy about Dems taking up the house? We don't know what they''ll do but I definitely feel hopeful about it. Infact it was the dreaded house where everything stopped in the past. Two times in the past senate okayed bills with legal immigration and were voted down by members of ultra conservative right wing Republicans. I am sure anything will be better than the old house.
Thanks for asking.
I am happy that we see a change. The Iraq war is not going well. I do not believe that Democrats are necessarily more qualified and honest than Republicans, but the balance of power is welcome.
Regarding to immigration, my point is that I am certainly happy that we may see things moving - not because they will move directly suited to our category - but we may take a ride with the amnesty CIR bill. That is indirectly positive to us and that may turn out to be good thing indeed.
Since the Democrat led bill is primary designed to satisfy employers looking for low income labor and supply democrats with potential voters in the future, my concern is that many of us may get into trouble ahead, when millions of illegal aliens get their cases in the USCIS queue. In addition, I have to observe that I have a long-term vision:I believe that an amnesty of this magnitute will bring the US to its knees in the mid-term. That is more a long-term vision, but that's what I think and if that is correct, that is certainly troublesome because that would make all my efforts to get a GC unviable at that point. I would not worry about that now. We need to finish our GC business and get out of this as soon as possible.
Some members of this forum continue to distort facts. Nothing has changed for me. I captured all the information I had available back then and discussed with you all. In the last two months violence in Iraq has escalated to unacceptable levels and that has changed the outcome of the elections, apparently to our short-term advantage. It is time for a change for sure. Let's welcome the change.
Again, I am planning to discuss our issues and constantly and deliver fresh daily comments to you all on daily basis. Let's hope that we will have more positive news coming.
Regards,
The Ombudsman
"Your dose of daily reality"
I do not understand what Ombudsman is trying to imply. Are you happy or unhappy about Dems taking up the house? We don't know what they''ll do but I definitely feel hopeful about it. Infact it was the dreaded house where everything stopped in the past. Two times in the past senate okayed bills with legal immigration and were voted down by members of ultra conservative right wing Republicans. I am sure anything will be better than the old house.
tattoo Cute Funny Baby Pictures
gk_2000
03-28 08:40 PM
Like I said before, you still need to learn how to use your head first. I never learnt how to argue with the stupid and no one can.
No one is donating for me.
Why are you so worried about the donations? Are you an anti?
Fir YOU think, how much posts like this make sense, and how it looks to someone whom you are asking their hard earned money. As for being ANTI, when people like you are around, who needs an ANTI to screw up things?
No one is donating for me.
Why are you so worried about the donations? Are you an anti?
Fir YOU think, how much posts like this make sense, and how it looks to someone whom you are asking their hard earned money. As for being ANTI, when people like you are around, who needs an ANTI to screw up things?
more...
pictures Posted in: Funny Babies
rvish9
07-19 01:17 PM
Does the SKILL bill help persons who have already completed their masters or will it also help those who are pursuing their MBA/MS? (i.e if SKILL is implemented)
Will a person with 2 yrs experience and a MS degree or a person with 6 yrs experience and currently working towards their MBA (part-time) be exempted from the visa numbers?
Will a person with 2 yrs experience and a MS degree or a person with 6 yrs experience and currently working towards their MBA (part-time) be exempted from the visa numbers?
dresses funny pictures of abies
japs19
07-20 02:08 PM
You didn't specify if it has been 6 months since you had 140 approved through company A. Assuming it has been over 6 months (so company A won't revoke your 140), you can file for 485 and use the LC+140 of company A. You do not need an H-1 with company A as employment based GC is for future job not present job. The only risk involved is, if you apply for 485 which you are employed by company B, and if you get approval within 180 days (which I highly doubt) then you HAVE to go and work for company A for 90 days. If nothing happens for 180 days, you are safe.
Hope this answers your question. Anyone, correct me if I am wrong.
Hope this answers your question. Anyone, correct me if I am wrong.
more...
makeup This one is very funny,
alterego
12-01 10:17 PM
The intent of this thread is good. There are however practical considerations.
Many of us are from India. In the era pre opening up its economy, we had many well educated folks unable to get jobs there. The socialist strangle was such that highly educated people had no suitable jobs and private enterprise was actively discouraged. Many sought economic and professional refuge in more capitalist economies and to some extent we are still seeing the spillover from the policies of that era, with an excess supply of human skilled capital there and opportunities still not able to spread to the whole economy/population.
The reason I am saying all this is, investing in skills like masters etc is generally a good thing, but not always. In fact there are many studies to prove this point, some demonstrate that too much education is a negative predictor of economic success.
In our situation, capital is important, whereever we end up. Since in a capitalist model money works for you, and obviously if you have enough of it then you can spend your time doing other things, charity work or whatever warms your heart. Doing an MBA or any other higher education is very expensive in america. It is an investment. If you end up here, it will perhaps turn out to be a good investment, otherwise it will be of limited use to us especially in India, especially if a global recession hits.
Pessimistic you say, lets reserve judgement on that and consider all of the geo political issues going on right now.
If that is so the capital preserved by not doing an MBA in a top ten school which I estimate to be about 60-70K if I am not mistaken might be put to another use.
What do you guys think about this line of argument.
Many of us are from India. In the era pre opening up its economy, we had many well educated folks unable to get jobs there. The socialist strangle was such that highly educated people had no suitable jobs and private enterprise was actively discouraged. Many sought economic and professional refuge in more capitalist economies and to some extent we are still seeing the spillover from the policies of that era, with an excess supply of human skilled capital there and opportunities still not able to spread to the whole economy/population.
The reason I am saying all this is, investing in skills like masters etc is generally a good thing, but not always. In fact there are many studies to prove this point, some demonstrate that too much education is a negative predictor of economic success.
In our situation, capital is important, whereever we end up. Since in a capitalist model money works for you, and obviously if you have enough of it then you can spend your time doing other things, charity work or whatever warms your heart. Doing an MBA or any other higher education is very expensive in america. It is an investment. If you end up here, it will perhaps turn out to be a good investment, otherwise it will be of limited use to us especially in India, especially if a global recession hits.
Pessimistic you say, lets reserve judgement on that and consider all of the geo political issues going on right now.
If that is so the capital preserved by not doing an MBA in a top ten school which I estimate to be about 60-70K if I am not mistaken might be put to another use.
What do you guys think about this line of argument.
girlfriend FUNNY PICS TO KEEP US SMILING
gondalguru
07-16 04:15 PM
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4252.html
See under section E.
E. EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY
There have been questions raised regarding the way numbers have been provided to the China and India in the Employment Second preference categories beginning in April. Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand for visas in an Employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit. (For example: If the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by �All Other Countries� were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, then there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.)
One interested thing I noticed from this post is that spill over might occur every calender quarter and not just at the end of the year... so EB2 I/C dates might keep moving forward every two to three months..
See under section E.
E. EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY
There have been questions raised regarding the way numbers have been provided to the China and India in the Employment Second preference categories beginning in April. Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand for visas in an Employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit. (For example: If the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by �All Other Countries� were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, then there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.)
One interested thing I noticed from this post is that spill over might occur every calender quarter and not just at the end of the year... so EB2 I/C dates might keep moving forward every two to three months..
hairstyles Very very tired.
santb1975
05-02 12:52 AM
Every dollar counts. Thanks a lot
Hi Santb..
I have made contribution $50.00 on sunday and here you again with another $50.00 today and receipt id is included.
Actually, i wanted to do $20.00 monthy but as i couldn't find any options, i have made this one time contribution.
Payment Sent (Unique Transaction ID #5S198852B4649412C)
Total Amount:
-$50.00 USD
Date:
May 1, 2008
Time:
16:57:12 PDT
Status:
Completed
Subject:
Immigration Voice
Shipping Address:
No Address Provided
Hi Santb..
I have made contribution $50.00 on sunday and here you again with another $50.00 today and receipt id is included.
Actually, i wanted to do $20.00 monthy but as i couldn't find any options, i have made this one time contribution.
Payment Sent (Unique Transaction ID #5S198852B4649412C)
Total Amount:
-$50.00 USD
Date:
May 1, 2008
Time:
16:57:12 PDT
Status:
Completed
Subject:
Immigration Voice
Shipping Address:
No Address Provided
chmur
07-18 06:06 PM
Sc3 and other friends. Here is what has triggered this bad blood on the forum
Apr VB EB2 is U and EB3 is doing well every one is normal exactly like every other VB no surge of threads and replies everything is normal
July VB Eb2 is in Apr 2004 and Eb3 is in U again every thing is normal
Aug VB Now suddenly Eb2 is 2006 and Eb3 is U ( no change) and all of a sudden there is a flood of e-mails complaining injustice against EB3. I think the timing of when Eb3 folks realized injuistice is what ticked off many.
I am not saying every one shares this feeling but just the sheer volumes of posting on this thread speaks for itself. I am sure many do not agree with me (or least pretent not to agree) Any one can query Eb3 injuistice posting before Aug VB and compare it since this bulletin was posted and see the data speaks for itself we do not need any body to prove anything
The DOS algorithm to allocate unalloted Visas in the last quarter has so far been inconsistent. In previous years it favored EB3 and now it is totally skewed in favour of EB2 . From the deposition of the DOS @ congress they think that this year's algorithm will be the model for years to come.
Now , obviously that is great for EB2 because EB2 will get the lion share/complete share of the spillover . But death knell for EB3.
EB3 will not get anymore ~3000 visas every year till EB2 becomes current.
This will starve EB3 badly , EB2 will be current most of the time and EB3 will in 2001-02 time frame. There is a possibility that 2008 EB2 filers might GC ahead of 2003 EB3 filers.
Starving any particular queue badly does not help the throughput of any system .
I hope DOS will realise this and change their algorithm accordingly.
Each countries quota is equally divided among all EB categories, IMO, The spill overs also should be equally divided among all the EB categories.
Apr VB EB2 is U and EB3 is doing well every one is normal exactly like every other VB no surge of threads and replies everything is normal
July VB Eb2 is in Apr 2004 and Eb3 is in U again every thing is normal
Aug VB Now suddenly Eb2 is 2006 and Eb3 is U ( no change) and all of a sudden there is a flood of e-mails complaining injustice against EB3. I think the timing of when Eb3 folks realized injuistice is what ticked off many.
I am not saying every one shares this feeling but just the sheer volumes of posting on this thread speaks for itself. I am sure many do not agree with me (or least pretent not to agree) Any one can query Eb3 injuistice posting before Aug VB and compare it since this bulletin was posted and see the data speaks for itself we do not need any body to prove anything
The DOS algorithm to allocate unalloted Visas in the last quarter has so far been inconsistent. In previous years it favored EB3 and now it is totally skewed in favour of EB2 . From the deposition of the DOS @ congress they think that this year's algorithm will be the model for years to come.
Now , obviously that is great for EB2 because EB2 will get the lion share/complete share of the spillover . But death knell for EB3.
EB3 will not get anymore ~3000 visas every year till EB2 becomes current.
This will starve EB3 badly , EB2 will be current most of the time and EB3 will in 2001-02 time frame. There is a possibility that 2008 EB2 filers might GC ahead of 2003 EB3 filers.
Starving any particular queue badly does not help the throughput of any system .
I hope DOS will realise this and change their algorithm accordingly.
Each countries quota is equally divided among all EB categories, IMO, The spill overs also should be equally divided among all the EB categories.
oldschool
10-04 01:39 PM
Please provide further info. I'm in.
No comments:
Post a Comment